When 85 Equals 31
My friend Scott Kidder has posted an analysis of WIN which points out a fact that I was well aware of a long time ago. WIN’s claim to having 85 blogs (or whatever number they were screaming out) is a complete fallacy. Many of those blogs sit dormant and others just have “Best of WIN” type entries. So basically AOL paid $25M for 31 blogs…
God bless corporate America.
Hell when you look at things from this perspective the Instablogs launch doesn’t seem that bad. All this time at 9rules we were waiting for the day we would reach the same number of blogs as WIN only now to realize we surpassed them a long time ago. Funny, does this make us the largest blog network in the world?.
Related Stories
POSTED IN: Personal Thoughts
8 opinions for When 85 Equals 31
Ara
Oct 7, 2005 at 1:44 am
I don’t know. I’m always weary of a major corporate “launch” rivaling something that’s a grassroots effort. It’s kind of like the disaster that is the music industry’s answer to file sharing.
Rhys
Oct 7, 2005 at 2:57 am
That’s one of the dangers, I think, of having too many damn blogs to oversee.
Paul Watson
Oct 7, 2005 at 6:21 am
How many of those 31 are decent? I only know of Engadget really and I typically use Gizmodo instead.
Sumeet
Oct 7, 2005 at 6:16 pm
I’m no fan of AOL, but they are a pretty big company with (I’m assuming) a decent sized research department. It seems to me that, before spending millions of dollars on a sure-to-be publicized acquisition, they would have _at least_ browsed every blog under WIN. So, since there seems to be a relative consensus that many of the blogs under WIN aren’t even that amazing, it may be that AOL’s purchase has little to do with the blogs. Perhaps it was a PR move (I doubt it. $25 million could be spent better for PR than buying WIN) or maybe they just wanted to own the ideas, resources, and people that WIN contains. Regardless, AOL’s purchase can hardly be criticized on the level that the blogs they bought are lacking in number and quality, since AOL probably didn’t buy WIN for that reason.
Marco
Oct 8, 2005 at 8:52 am
I was completely amazed by the fact that a set of
Nick Douglas
Oct 9, 2005 at 6:19 pm
So 9rules counts as a network now?
Scrivs
Oct 9, 2005 at 8:43 pm
I think the name made it count like a Network a long time ago, although Duncan’s definition takes it out of the equation.
Marco
Oct 10, 2005 at 6:32 am
Something weird happened to my comment I think. It was ehm… longer than what’s visible now! ;)
Have an opinion? Leave a comment: